A week or so ago I had an email from a CASA
(court-appointed special advocate) working in Washington State. She asked a
very reasonable question: So, you say not to send young foster children for
Attachment Therapy. Well, what are our options? What should we do to help them?
In reply, I sent her a journal article and suggested
that she read about the Attachment and Biobehavioral Catch-up (ABC) program directed by Dr. Mary Dozier of
the University of Delaware. Dr. Dozier has spent 22 years developing this
program and has reported four randomized controlled trials showing its benefits
to children who have experienced serious adversity. ABC is now being
implemented in 15 states and is wanted in others, but Dr. Dozier is concerned
about maintaining high fidelity to the original program and must thus move more
slowly than we might like.
ABC is a 10-session program, done in the home by
trained coaches, which targets key child issues resulting from experiences of
adversity. The focus is on parenting behavior, not on underlying attitudes or
motives, and the parents may be neglecting birth parents, foster parent of
toddlers, or parents who have adopted internationally. Randomized controlled
trials have supported the effectiveness of ABC as done by certified coaches,
with long-term positive effects for children’s development. The coach does not
interact with the children, but watches and comments on the parent’s behavior.
ABC teaches and increases three basic parenting
behaviors: 1) nurturance, 2) following the child’s lead, and 3) non-frightening
behavior. These behaviors are not all carried out at the same time, so a
challenge for a parent is deciding which kind of behavior is suitable at a
given time.
Nurturance,
or comforting or helping when the child needs this, is especially important for
children who have experienced early adversity. Their high rate of disorganized
attachment behavior shows that they have no consistent strategy for deciding
whether to approach or avoid an adult caregiver, so caregivers need to be able
to recognize situations and subtle communications showing a need for
nurturance. When toddlers are avoidant or resistant to nurturance, caregivers
tend to respond “in kind” – to feel rejected and to avoid trying to comfort the
child. To increase nurturance, ABC-trained coaches actively comment in the moment by making, once a minute,
positive comments on a caregiver’s nurturing behavior, like going to a child
who has fallen down or picking up a child who approaches the caregiver.
Increasing parents’ nurturing behavior helps to
decrease the non-nurturing behaviors that are too easily resorted to when
toddlers are perceived as avoiding caregivers. These behaviors include making
fun of the child, acting on unrealistic expectations of the child, deliberately
letting a child get into difficulty “so he will learn”, telling the child
“you’re okay, you’re not hurt” or “you’re too big to cry”, ignoring the child,
or distracting the hurt child by pointing to something interesting. These actions
all tell the child that the parent is saying “you don’t need me”, whereas the
fact is that the child does need a nurturing caregiver and needs to identify a
specific adult as actually being such a person.
Nurturing behavior involves responding to the
distressed child’s needs with minimum--
or perhaps, no—signals from the child.
This behavior is different from following the child’s lead, in which the
parent responds to a child’s interest signaled by speech, gaze direction,
movement, or toy play. For example, if a toddler is banging two blocks
together, a caregiver might follow his lead by banging two other blocks or by
putting one block forward to join in the banging, or jut by saying “bang!” each
time. A caregiver is not following the child’s lead if he or she takes one of
the blocks and asks the child to say what the letter on it is, or takes the
blocks and starts to build a tower with them.
These parent activities have their place, but ABC tries to increase the
adult’s success in identifying the child’s interest and making use of it for
pleasurable communication.
Parent behavior that does not follow the child’s
lead can be “teach-y” under the wrong circumstances, bossy, intrusive, or
ignoring. Of course, there are many times when a caregiver appropriately does
not follow a child’s lead, especially when limits need to be set or boundaries
established. The ABC goal is to increase the caregiver’s ability to follow the
child’s lead when doing so is appropriate--
not when the child’s lead will take the child or others into danger.
ABC-trained parents also learn to avoid frightening behavior that makes it more
difficult for a young child to stay calm and regulated. This includes intrusive
behavior like grabbing or tickling. For a child who has experienced severe
adversity, typical “normal” parent-toddler games like “I’m gonna get you”, the
threatened tickle with a finger that goes around and around near the child’s
belly, or exciting chasing and hiding, may all be inappropriately frightening.
The child who still struggles with knowing whether to approach or avoid a
caregiver may interpret even play at frightening behavior as a signal that this
adult should be avoided if possible.
The ultimate goal of ABC is to improve the ability
of the child to stay calm and regulated in the everyday circumstances of the
home. This improved regulation allows the child to learn and communicate more
effectively and to have more inhibitory control. One of the ABC outcomes is
that children of ABC-coached parents later have more success than controls in a
laboratory test where they are shown some fascinating toys and told not to
touch them by an adult who then leaves the room.
When Internet sites for foster and adoptive parents
tell parents that conventional treatment “just makes a child worse”, or when
they advocate highly authoritarian, intrusive, managing methods that are supposed
to make maltreated children “attached” and therefore obedient, they are badly mistaken
(to put it politely). Evidence-based treatments like ABC and PCIT (Parent-child
Interaction Therapy) can make enormous positive differences to the lives of
children and families. I hope my CASA correspondent will pass along what I told
her to others and help them understand this.
The non-frightening behaviour is one that can be worked on a lot more.
ReplyDeleteI don't think we really appreciate or remember just how scary these adult-directed games can be.
Chasing and hiding, for instance, is easy to see where it could be frightening.
"The child who still struggles with knowing whether to approach or avoid a caregiver may interpret even play at frightening behavior as a signal that this adult should be avoided if possible."
The other element was following the child's lead and/or being nurturing - responding to needs in the face of distress.
It's hard to avoid "eye for an eye; tooth for a tooth" especially when we may have sacrificed a lot. This is where the authoritarian "treatments" hurt and harm. And they make you burrow and protect your "investment".
Increasing parents’ nurturing behavior helps to decrease the non-nurturing behaviors that are too easily resorted to when toddlers are perceived as avoiding caregivers. These behaviors include making fun of the child, acting on unrealistic expectations of the child, deliberately letting a child get into difficulty “so he will learn”, telling the child “you’re okay, you’re not hurt” or “you’re too big to cry”, ignoring the child, or distracting the hurt child by pointing to something interesting. These actions all tell the child that the parent is saying “you don’t need me”, whereas the fact is that the child does need a nurturing caregiver and needs to identify a specific adult as actually being such a person.
How important it is to identify a specific adult. And be shown that by behaviour which makes you tend to approach.
The perception of avoidance is far more than the avoidance itself.
Do toddlers have consistent strategies for showing interest? Is this where the subtle may play?
The ABC approach to toy play is great and it does lead to this:
"One of the ABC outcomes is that children of ABC-coached parents later have more success than controls in a laboratory test where they are shown some fascinating toys and told not to touch them by an adult who then leaves the room."
I had the pleasant and informative experience of seeing Dr. Dozier present at the Adoption Initiative conference in Monclair NJ last week. I was impressed with her common sense approach to dealing with traumatized toddlers in foster care, those being adopted and those returned to natural parents to help the parents help the children. I hope her research gets widely distributed to those who need it.
ReplyDeleteSo say I,too-- she is working so hard to be sure not only that the work is distributed, but that people are not doing it without adequate training and screening. She has said that although most people can pass the screening test, there are some who just can't seem to do the job well enough to justify training them.
Delete