In the last two posts, I’ve been discussing some
issues brought up by Elisa B., the mother of a two-year-old who has been having
difficulty in his day care since he was separated from a favorite teacher. Elisa
has found that the separation was intentional and that the day care staff
believes that Billy should be developing more casual affectionate relationships
with more child care providers rather than having a strong relationship with
one. She also found that the plan is to move Billy to yet another classroom in
about 6 weeks.
I mentioned in the last post that Developmentally
Appropriate Practice requires attention to the needs and abilities
characteristic of a particular age group (and I might point out that children
are generally thought to do better with a small number of familiar people until
at least 36 months of age, so I don’t think the day care center is aware of
relevant appropriate practice). In addition, because children do not all
develop along exactly the same schedule, or even develop all their abilities at
the same rate, individually appropriate practice is also needed.
An essential part of individualization is attention
to temperament. This term refers to
the biological, constitutional characteristics unique to each person, which
determine the ways each of us reacts to the world. There are several ways of
looking at temperament, but they all assume that people have characteristics at
birth which continue to be expressed throughout their lives. Naturally, because
each person changes with age, the behaviors that express temperamental
characteristics change over time, but the temperament remains the same. For
example, the 6-month-old who eagerly tries new foods may become the
ten-year-old who likes some foods much better than others but is enthusiastic
about new games or people. All temperamental differences are by definition
within the normal range of development, but some temperamental patterns take
more support and guidance than others.
Elisa
describes Billy as always having cried a lot, being shy around other
people even if his mother and father were there, and having a lot of trouble
adjusting when he first attended day care at 13 months. Without having any other information, I’m
guessing that Billy has three important temperamental characteristics. He has negative mood quality, so that even if there
is nothing much happening his tendency is to be sad rather than cheerful. He withdraws from new events and people rather than
approaching them eagerly. And he is slow
to adapt to situations.
These “difficult” temperamental characteristics have
their advantages. A child like this does not wander off with strangers, drink
liquids the painters left sitting around, or approach stray dogs. At the beach,
he won’t go into the water when his mother isn’t watching (in fact, lots of
luck getting him in there before Labor Day). But, in modern life, adults are
not likely to see this as an ideal temperament. Families are all scheduled up
and feel they should be able to rush hither and thither without pausing for
adjustment. However, a child with this sort of “difficult” temperament just can’t
be forced to accept rapid changes without responding with many tears and fears.
“Difficult” children can do very well if they are
given plenty of affectionate guidance and if their reactions are anticipated.
It would certainly be a big surprise if a child like Billy took happily to day
care at 13 months. What he needed, and still needs, is plenty of time for
adjustment to any new person or situation. What-- does somebody say he’ll have to do better
eventually, so why not make him do it now? First of all, he can’t do it now. He
doesn’t have the skills. Second, he will be able to do a good job later, and be
his best mental and emotional self, if he now learns from adults how to cope.
Doing new things a little at a time, having a chance to watch other children do
them, and knowing that a familiar adult is nearby-- these are all factors that can make a new
situation be, as one of my sons used to say, “funner than I thought!”
Interestingly, we have no problem with letting adults or even older children
handle their introduction to new things as they see fit, but some of us still
believe that to allow “difficult”
toddlers to take their time is spoiling or babying them. On the contrary, it’s
providing what teachers call scaffolding to help them master the situation.
Although it’s not well understood how temperament is
determined, it probably has at least some genetic causes. One of the things
Elisa B. said about herself was that she tended to be anxious and depressed. This
makes me wonder whether she shares Billy’s temperament to some extent, which
may help her have some insight into his feelings. Whatever day care arrangement
Elisa finally makes, I hope it will be one where the caregivers are able to
recognize the accuracy of her statements about Billy.
One more issue needs to be discussed. Elisa has asked
me whether it would be good to have Billy tested for his attachment to her and
to seek treatment for any problems that showed up. I have to say that I would
see no point to doing this. First of all, the major way of evaluating
attachment, the Strange Situation, was developed as a way of looking at
differences between groups, not differences between individuals. The Strange
Situation does not offer a clear assessment of individual attachment, and
although it might provide guidance for clinical work with a family, very few
clinicians are trained to do it or have in their offices the physical
arrangements it requires. In any case, there is no question in my mind that the
reported behavior shows that Billy is much attached to his mother and also
quite able to form attachments to other caregivers when given time and
opportunity. He does not need help or guidance in attachment-- just a chance to do it. However, if Elisa
feels that the situation is too difficult to deal with, she and Billy might
benefit from one of the treatments (like DIR) that works with parents and
children together to improve their emotional communication.
A while ago, I came across a parent education pamphlet,
put out by a major infant mental health group, that made a remarkable error
about attachment. It stated that if children are securely attached, they will
not cry when left at day care. This is absolute nonsense, and I hope that Elisa
has not been thinking that it’s true. Secure attachment means that when the young
child is distressed, he or she can be comforted by a familiar caregiver, and
that the child can use that caregiver as a secure base for exploration. Infants
over about 8 months of age, toddlers, and even young preschoolers are quite
likely to cry at least briefly when left by a familiar person-- unless another familiar attachment figure has
received them and begun to talk to and hold them. Young children who do not react to separation are much more
likely to need some form of intervention, convenient though their behavior may
seem to parents and caregivers.
I hope Elisa and Billy are able to find a day care
arrangement where caregivers understand some of the points I’ve been making and
are aware of appropriate practice with different developmental stages and
different personalities. Finding such a place would make the next few years of
Billy’s life far more pleasant for the whole family.
No comments:
Post a Comment