It’s disturbing and even scary when children
constantly disobey, disrupt, and behave aggressively toward other people. Small
wonder that parents worry that they will not be able to control those child
behaviors and the children will get worse and worse until they become dangerous
criminals. Adoptive parents are often especially concerned because they wonder
what unknown genetic element may be influencing the children’s development and
personalities.
The answer given to these worried parents by some
alternative psychotherapists is that the children are suffering from
“attachment disorders”—that these disorders came from separation from the birth
parents and adoption, or from painful medical experiences in infancy, or from
institutional care. Alternative therapists may even claim that disruptive
behaviors are part of the conventional diagnosis of Reactive Attachment
Disorder, although they are not. When these claims about attachment effects are
made, it is often suggested that the children need some form of “attachment
therapy” that will correct the effects of their early experiences. If the
children don’t get those treatments, the parents are told, they will become
murderers, thieves, etc.—and their first victims will be their parents. This
frightening argument can be very persuasive to anxious and uncertain parents,
and they may well sign on for the treatment suggested.
Unfortunately, although the parents’ concerns are
certainly legitimate, these disturbing behaviors have nothing to do with
attachment, and even if they did, “attachment therapies” done by alternative
therapists are not known to affect attachment. But what should they do? A recent
article by Jonathan Perle, in Early Child
Development and Care (2018), “Rethinking ‘wait and see’ philosophies for childhood
disruptive behavior: A guide for paediatric medical providers” provides some
suggestions about how families can work with their pediatricians to evaluate
and work to correct disruptive behaviors like defiance, tantrums, aggression,
and bad language in children from 2 to 7 years of age.
First, Perle points out that some disruptive behaviors
like tantrums are very predictable in young children. Issues arise when the
behaviors are more frequent than would normally be expected, persist to a
later-than-usual age, cause disruption for the whole day rather than being
resolved, or get more frequent with time. Difficult as disruptive behaviors may
be for families, they cause even more problems for the children in the long
run, as exasperated parents punish to the point of physical abuse, schools isolate and fail to educate the
“problem child”, and other children reject and avoid the disrupter.
Perle notes that the longer these problem behaviors go
on, the more difficult they are to treat. Children learn to use disruption as
an effective way to avoid things they don’t want to do (and every child is
asked daily to do things he or she doesn’t want). Parents, teachers, and other
children drop their demands in order to escape the unpleasantness created when they
press a disruptive child to cooperate. Thus both the disruptive child and other
people daily experience the reward of letting the child do as he or she likes.
Repetition and reward lead to stronger learning, and adult attempts to withhold
that reward by insisting on cooperation lead to such an outburst of unwanted
behavior that they usually give in.
In Perle’s paper, he comments on previous research on
children’s disruptive behavior that gives us an idea of what is common,
“normal” behavior and what is not. Tantrums in children aged 3 to 5 are usually
brief, no more than 5 to 10 minutes, and they are not very aggressive. The
children scream, fall to the ground, cry, make mild aggressive remarks (“Don’t
like you!”), and may impulsively strike or kick out, but do not usually bite,
kick or hit with intensity. Children this age do not usually attack animals or
people or destroy property in any severe way. The usual behaviors may include
some sulking and pouting after the tantrum, but as children get older and
develop better language and self-regulation skills there is less of that. By
age 5 or 6, severely aggressive behaviors and daily tantrums with refusal of
compliance even when adult raise their voices would be considered unusual and
treatment would be a good idea for the child and the family. Adults
particularly need to learn and practice ways to guide the child toward
compliance without causing the disruptive behavior to escalate or to be
maintained.
Importantly, Perle notes that disruptive and
apparently aggressive behavior may emerge from a child’s anxiety. For instance
,“ a child who is afraid of insects such as bees or
ants may begin to protest, then cry, then ultimately hit or kick an adult to
get away from insects when brought to a park. Similar reactive avoidance-based
disruptive behaviours could be seen related to a variety of emotional fears
including dark situations, inclement weather, separation from a caregiver,
social settings, or in response to sensory-based sensitivities (e.g. a child
exhibits a tantrum in response [to], or to avoid over stimulating items or
situations such as clothing, noises, smells, foods, or light”. In these cases,
the child may have learned that disruptive behavior is rewarded by helping the
child escape from a frightening situation, and unless the child’s anxiety is
understood it will be difficult to understand what the reward is.
These problems of disruptive behavior,
although very real and potentially becoming worse, have nothing to do with
attachment, nor will they be improved by “attachment therapies”. Effective
treatments involve various evidence-based types of parent management training.
Happily, when these are used, families benefit not only from improved daily
life, but they are also likely to feel that everyone is now better “attached”
than they were.
Hi Dr.Mercer
ReplyDeleteThis was a very helpful post. It was very valuable to read. I was also wondering if you have any posts on in utero trauma? I hear that term a lot now. Specifically, is prenatal substance exposure considered an in utero trauma? What exactly is in utero trauma? Is prenatal substance exposure the same level of trauma as if a child had experienced real trauma after they were born? I am just confused. As an adoptive mom, my son has never had a traumatic day in his life. We've had him since he was born. Yet he was drug and alcohol exposed prenatally. I'm being told this is considered trauma and I should be doing trauma based therapy with him. He does have significant behavioral and regulation issues at age seven. But I attribute that more to being meth, alcohol and heroin exposed prenatally from his birth mom and ADHD. But I'm hearing a lot about in utero trauma in adoption circles. If you could direct me to any blog posts I'd be grateful. Thank you!